Skip to content
Active Motif

The proteomics scientist's guide to lysis that keeps up with your mass spec

When sample prep is the slow step, it quietly decides how many samples your study can include — this guide shows how plate-based acoustic lysis takes that limit off the table.

What You'll See Inside

Full-plate lysis

Disrupt cells across a full 96-well plate in a single acoustic run.

Protein extraction

Pull protein out of disrupted cells, intact and ready to quantify.

Into your LC-MS

Get clean lysate that drops straight into your mass spec workflow.

Why it scales

When prep keeps up, the prep step stops capping how many samples you run.

Download the guide

Your browser doesn't support embedded PDFs. Download the guide to read it.

← Back to all resources

Related resources

PIXUL for Proteomics Core Facilities: One Instrument for Your Whole Sample Range — featured image Brochure
Proteomics PIXUL

PIXUL for Proteomics Core Facilities: One Instrument for Your Whole Sample Range

How a shared proteomics core facility preps its whole sample range, tough samples included, in one walk-away run instead of one sample at a time. This two-page reference covers the three-step acoustic workflow, the all-in-one advantage over probe and focused-ultrasonication sample prep, and a head-to-head showing equivalent peptide and protein recovery against a probe sonicator at 96-sample scale.

Read More
A practical guide to choosing a cell disruption and protein extraction instrument for a proteomics core facility — featured image Guide
Proteomics PIXUL

A practical guide to choosing a cell disruption and protein extraction instrument for a proteomics core facility

A practical decision guide for choosing the cell-disruption and protein-extraction instrument at the front of a proteomics core facility's workflow. Walks the six criteria that matter (versatility, reliability and self-sufficiency, hard-sample confidence, throughput without babysitting, consistency, and easy-to-obtain standard plates) and includes a scoring worksheet to evaluate any candidate.

Read Guide
How PIXUL lyses the tough ones: cell-wall organisms, bacteria, and yeast at 96-well scale — featured image Blog
Proteomics PIXUL

How PIXUL lyses the tough ones: cell-wall organisms, bacteria, and yeast at 96-well scale

The samples that worry operators — yeast, bacteria, tough tissue — aren't a different-instrument problem. With PIXUL, they're mostly a question of how much disruption energy and time the wall in front of you needs. Worked protocols for bacteria (minutes, with an enzymatic assist for screening by gel — not deep LC-MS proteomics), yeast (30–60 minutes in SDS-based buffer, no beads), and tough tissue (in between, sometimes with a pre-step), with an honest concession that for a genuinely extreme matrix a dedicated mechanical method may still be the right tool.

Read More
Onboarding a new user to PIXUL: what method transfer actually takes — featured image Blog
Proteomics PIXUL

Onboarding a new user to PIXUL: what method transfer actually takes

Bringing up a new sample-prep instrument usually means weeks of method development. With PIXUL — a 96-well sonicator — the honest answer is closer to: transfer the protocol, then choose a run time. A new user inherits a settled method instead of building one, tunes a single variable (disruption time) to their sample, and the protocol transfers cleanly across people and institutions — with the install handled over a call.

Read More
Where PIXUL fits in a proteomics pipeline: from disruption to LC-MS — featured image Blog
Proteomics PIXUL

Where PIXUL fits in a proteomics pipeline: from disruption to LC-MS

Most of a proteomics pipeline is already standardized — reduction and alkylation, digestion, peptide clean-up, the LC gradient, the mass spec and its search. The step that's least settled, and most manual, sits right at the front: getting clean, solubilized protein out of whatever sample came in. PIXUL drops into that slot, disrupting cells and solubilizing protein from up to 96 wells of a standard plate in one hands-off run — so the disruption step changes while the rest of the pipeline (clean-up, digestion, peptide loading, LC-MS/MS) stays the workflow you already run.

Read More
Bead beating vs. sonication: specialize for one tough sample, or standardize across many? — featured image Blog
Sample Preparation

Bead beating vs. sonication: specialize for one tough sample, or standardize across many?

Mechanical disruption is the specialist's tool for the toughest matrices — bead beating earns its place on spores, fungi, fibrous plant and tissue. The question for a shared core is whether you're optimizing for one of those, or for the range. A side-by-side comparison of bead beating, mechanical homogenization, and pressure cycling against a high-throughput sonicator (PIXUL) on per-sample-type specialization, standardization across a varied plate, consumables, hands-off throughput, and when each is the right call.

Read More
How to justify a versatile sonicator to your capital committee — featured image Blog
Proteomics

How to justify a versatile sonicator to your capital committee

The case that wins funding isn't the lowest price. It's how much of the facility's range a single capital line absorbs — and how little it costs to keep running once it's in. The committee-defense argument that holds up: one versatile, self-maintained instrument that absorbs the facility's range and replaces several future single-purpose purchases — on open standard consumables the core controls.

Read More